Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Infection ; 51(2): 407-416, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35922704

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The clinical course of COVID-19 has been complicated by secondary infections, including bacterial and fungal infections. The rapid rise in the incidence of invasive mucormycosis in these patients is very much concerning. COVID-19-associated mucormycosis was detected in huge numbers during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in India, with several predisposing factors indicated in its pathogenesis. This study aimed to evaluate the epidemiology, predisposing factor, cumulative mortality and factors affecting outcomes among the coronavirus disease COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM). METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study across three tertiary health care centers in Southern part of India was conducted during April-June 2021. RESULTS: Among the 217 cases of CAM, mucormycosis affecting the nasal sinuses was the commonest, affecting 95 (44%) of the patients, orbital extension seen in 84 (38%), pulmonary (n = 25, 12%), gastrointestinal (n = 6, 3%), isolated cerebral (n = 2) and disseminated mucormycosis (n = 2). Diabetes mellitus, high-dose systemic steroids were the most common underlying disease among CAM patients. The mucormycosis-associated case-fatality at 6 weeks was 14%, cerebral or GI or disseminated mucormycosis had 9 times higher risk of death compared to other locations. Extensive surgical debridement along with sequential antifungal drug treatment improved the survival in mucormycosis patients. CONCLUSION: Judicious and appropriate management of the predisposing factor and factors affecting mortality associated with CAM with multi-disciplinary approach and timely surgical and medical management can be much helpful in achieving a successful outcome.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Mucormicosis , Humanos , Mucormicosis/epidemiología , Mucormicosis/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pandemias , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , India/epidemiología , Causalidad , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico
3.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 61(2): 369-376.e1, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32822750

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Older adults with advanced cancer face uncertainty related to their disease and treatment. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the associations of uncertainty with psychological health and quality of life (QoL) in older adults with advanced cancer. METHODS: Secondary cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from a national clustered geriatric assessment trial. Patients 70 years and older with advanced cancer considering a new line of chemotherapy were recruited. We measured uncertainty using the modified nine-item Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale. Dependent variables included anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), depression (Generalized Depression Scale-15), distress (distress thermometer), QoL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General), and emotional well-being (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General subscale). We used multivariate linear regression analyses to evaluate the association of uncertainty with each dependent variable. We conducted a partial least squares analysis with a variable importance in projection (VIP) plot to assess the contribution of individual variables to the model. Variables with a VIP <0.8 were considered less influential. RESULTS: We included 527 patients (median age 76 years; range 70-96). In multivariate analyses, higher levels of uncertainty were significantly associated with greater anxiety (ß = 0.11; SE = 0.04), depression (ß = 0.09; SE = 0.02), distress (ß = 0.12; SE = 0.02), as well as lower QoL (ß = -1.08; SE = 0.11) and emotional well-being (ß = -0.29; SE = 0.03); the effect sizes were considered small. Uncertainty items related to disease and treatment were most strongly associated with psychological health and QoL scores (all VIP >0.8). CONCLUSION: Uncertainty among older patients with advanced cancer is associated with worse psychological health and QoL. Tailored uncertainty management strategies are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/epidemiología , Humanos , Salud Mental , Neoplasias/terapia , Incertidumbre
4.
Cancer ; 125(14): 2506-2513, 2019 07 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30920646

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Older patients with advanced cancer who are 100% certain they will be cured pose unique challenges for clinical decision making, but to the authors' knowledge, the prevalence and correlates of absolute certainty about curability (ACC) are unknown. METHODS: Cross-sectional data were collected in a geriatric assessment trial. ACC was assessed by asking patients, "What do you believe are the chances that your cancer will go away and never come back with treatment?" Response options were 100% (coded as ACC), >50%, 50/50, <50%, 0%, and uncertain. The willingness to bear adversity in exchange for longevity was assessed by asking patients to consider trade-offs between survival and 2 clinical outcomes that varied in abstractness: 1) maintaining quality of life (QOL; an abstract outcome); and 2) specific treatment-related toxicities (eg, nausea/vomiting, worsening memory). Logistic regression was used to assess the independent associations between willingness to bear adversity and ACC. RESULTS: Of the 524 patients aged 70 to 96 years, approximately 5.3% reported that there was a 100% chance that their cancer would be cured (ACC). ACC was not found to be significantly associated with willingness to bear treatment-related toxicities, but was more common among patients who were willing to trade QOL for survival (adjusted odds ratio, 4.08; 95% CI, 1.17-14.26). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who were more willing to bear adversity in the form of an abstract state, namely decreased QOL, were more likely to demonstrate ACC. Although conversations regarding prognosis should be conducted with all patients, those who are willing to trade QOL for survival may especially benefit from conversations that focus on values and emotions.


Asunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/psicología , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Esperanza , Neoplasias/psicología , Neoplasias/terapia , Prioridad del Paciente/psicología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Estudios de Cohortes , Comunicación , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Náusea/inducido químicamente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Pronóstico , Calidad de Vida , Vómitos/inducido químicamente
5.
Oncologist ; 24(5): 688-690, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30728277
6.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 16(9): 1055-1064, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30181417

RESUMEN

Background: Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), dialysis for acute kidney failure, and other critical care therapies (CCTs) are associated with a high risk for complications in patients with metastatic cancer. Inpatient palliative care (IPC) can assist in assessing patients' preferences for life-prolonging treatment at the end of life. This study investigated the use pattern of IPC, outcomes (in-hospital mortality, length of stay [LOS], discharge destination, and cost of care), and predictors of IPC use in patients with metastatic cancer who received CCTs. We hypothesized that IPC services are underused in this cohort. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we used the 2010 California State Inpatient Databases to identify adults with metastatic cancer who received CCTs that are common and reliably coded (IMV, tracheostomy, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube, dialysis for acute kidney failure, and total parenteral nutrition). We determined IPC use in all patients, in those who received IMV, and across 4 cancer subtypes (lung, breast, colorectal, and genitourinary). Outcomes were assessed based on IPC use. Multivariable analyses were used to investigate factors associated with IPC use. Results: We identified 5,862 hospitalizations, 19.8% of which used IPC services. IPC use varied across cancer subtypes (lung, 28.3%; breast, 22.4%; colorectal, 12.8%; genitourinary, 16.1%; P<.01). Patients who received and did not receive IPC services had high in-hospital mortality rates (63.9% and 29.8%, respectively), and costs of care and LOS were lower in survivors who received IPC compared with those who did not. Predictors of IPC use were lung cancer (vs colorectal or genitourinary cancer), higher comorbidity score, do-not-resuscitate status on admission or within 24 hours of admission, infections (vs cancer-related diagnoses), and higher hospital bed count. Conclusions: Use of IPC was low in the cohort who received CCTs with poor outcomes, although data on outpatient palliative care services is lacking. Predictors of IPC use may be used to identify patients who may benefit from these services.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidado Terminal/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Supervivientes de Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Neoplasias/patología , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Prioridad del Paciente/psicología , Prioridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cuidado Terminal/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Indian J Urol ; 34(1): 56-61, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29343914

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Sacral agenesis (SA) is a caudal regression anomaly that can cause neurogenic bladder but is not generally recognized as high risk. We studied the clinical presentation, upper urinary tract, bone and spine abnormalities, and urodynamic findings in patients with SA and compared them with related high-risk conditions, anorectal malformation (ARM), and cloacal malformation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient records between May 2011 and December 2015 were identified and grouped into isolated SA without an overt anomaly (Group I), SA with overt caudal regression anomalies (Group II), and ARM or cloacal malformation without the SA (Group III). Distribution of clinical and urodynamic findings and factors associated with reduced eGFR were tested with rank sum test, t-test, and unadjusted odds (P < 0.05 significant) using R statistical program (version 3.1.3). RESULTS: Of 605 neurogenic bladder patients treated in the study period, 39 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. 12 were Group I, 5 Group II, and 22 Group III. Long-standing lower urinary symptoms were noted in all SA patients. Group I patients were older (14.5 years vs. 6 years and 5 years for II and III). Patients with SA (Group I and II) had poor compliance (6.7 ml/cmH2O, interquartile range [IQR] 4-13.6 ml/cmH2O), reduced age-adjusted bladder capacity (59%, IQR 22-85%), elevated end-fill pressure (22 cmH2O, IQR 11-28 cmH2O), hydronephrosis (88%), and reduction in eGFR (29%), all comparable to Group III. Most had Renshaw type II SA and tethered spinal cord rather than wedge-shaped termination. Limitations include small numbers and significant selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic neurogenic bladder due to SA may cause renal damage similar to ARM but often eludes diagnosis.

8.
Palliat Support Care ; 16(1): 60-72, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28566103

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Despite national guidelines recommending early concurrent palliative care for individuals newly diagnosed with metastatic cancer, few community cancer centers, especially those in underserved rural areas do so. We are implementing an early concurrent palliative care model, ENABLE (Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends) in four, rural-serving community cancer centers. Our objective was to develop a "toolkit" to assist community cancer centers that wish to integrate early palliative care for patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer and their family caregivers. METHOD: Guided by the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness-Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework, we undertook an instrument-development process based on the literature, expert and site stakeholder review and feedback, and pilot testing during site visits. RESULTS: We developed four instruments to measure ENABLE implementation: (1) the ENABLE RE-AIM Self-Assessment Tool to assess reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance; (2) the ENABLE General Organizational Index to assess institutional implementation; (3) an Implementation Costs Tool; and (4) an Oncology Clinicians' Perceptions of Early Concurrent Oncology Palliative Care survey. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: We developed four measures to determine early palliative care implementation. These measures have been pilot-tested, and will be integrated into a comprehensive "toolkit" to assist community cancer centers to measure implementation outcomes. We describe the lessons learned and recommend strategies for promoting long-term program sustainability.


Asunto(s)
Centros Comunitarios de Salud/tendencias , Neoplasias/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Población Rural , Alabama , Humanos , Oncología Médica , Cuidados Paliativos/psicología , Percepción , Médicos/psicología , Proyectos Piloto , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/métodos , Autoevaluación (Psicología) , South Carolina , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Recursos Humanos
9.
N Engl J Med ; 372(14): 1375, 2015 04 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25830438
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...